Beveridge & Diamond
 

Endangered Species Act - Environmental

The Endangered Species Act (ESA), perhaps the most stringent and unyielding of all environmental statutes, frequently has been used as a tool to stop major federal and private projects, and as such, it has the power to shape even local land use decisions across the nation.  Beveridge & Diamond has had extensive experience with the prohibitions and procedures of the federal ESA and analogous state laws.  We work with clients to develop strategies for projects to get them through the ESA process, allowing development to proceed while the species are protected.  We have also represented a number of clients in federal court litigation and enforcement actions.

Administered jointly by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) and the National Marine Fisheries Service, the ESA has three main components relevant to our clients:  (1) the listing process, (2) the “take” prohibition, and (3) the incidental take permitting processes.

The listing process in Section 4 is the linchpin of the Act, because the listing of a species as threatened or endangered (and its critical habitat designated) triggers the Act’s “take” prohibition.  Therefore, we encourage our clients to become active participants in this process.  Greater awareness of the “take” prohibition also helps clients avoid criminal or civil liability.

The Section 7 and Section 10 incidental take permitting processes provide that a “take” which is incidental to an otherwise lawful activity may be permitted in certain circumstances and under certain conditions.  Section 7 may be used if the project has a federal nexus; i.e., requires a federal permit or receives federal funds.  Under Section 7, the permitting or funding agency must consult with FWS in order to obtain an incidental take permit. Section 10 may be used for private projects without a federal nexus.  Under Section 10, the project applicant must prepare a Habitat Conservation Plan (HCP) prior to obtaining an incidental take permit.

Navigating project approval when federally listed species may be impacted requires a complete understanding of the ESA.  Our clients’ projects involve all the major elements of the Act, participating in the listing and/or critical habitat designation process, avoiding liability for an illegal “take,” navigating the incidental take permitting processes and keeping abreast of the various proposed guidance documents.  Our attorneys bring practical experience gained from the U.S. Department of Justice and the U.S. Department of the Interior to all issues relating to the ESA.

Noteworthy
Noteworthy

Some examples of our work in this area include:

  • We have successfully challenged the FWS decisions to list species.
  • We assist developer, telecommunications, energy and other clients in navigating the Section 7 consultation process.
  • We guide various counties as well as private project applicants in the planning and development of regional as well as individual HCPs.
  • We filed amicus briefs to uphold the FWS “no surprises” policy, which is designed to give assurances to HCP applicants that once finalized, the FWS cannot come back and demand more land, water, financial resources or additional restrictions.
  • We assisted a major mining company negotiate with the FWS concerning biological opinions for proposed land exchanges in Arizona.
  • We are currently counseling a major housing developer on Section 7 issues affecting a planned mixed-use project in Delaware.